Editorial Standards

Editorial Policy & Review Standards

Raw Honey Guide publishes research-backed content about honey varieties, health applications, and beekeeping. This page explains how we research, write, fact-check, and update every article — and how we handle conflicts of interest, corrections, and medical disclaimers.

Editorial Independence

Raw Honey Guide is an independent educational resource. We are not owned by, affiliated with, or funded by any honey brand, beekeeping association, supplement company, or retailer. We do not accept payment for editorial coverage, sponsored reviews, or product placement.

When we recommend specific products, varieties, or brands, those recommendations are based on:

  • Published quality certifications (USDA Organic, True Source Certified, UMF/MGO ratings)
  • Peer-reviewed research on composition, bioactivity, and safety
  • Publicly verifiable production and sourcing information
  • No commercial relationship with the producer or retailer

Our honey variety dataset is published under a CC BY 4.0 open license so anyone can verify the data behind our content.

Evidence Standards

We use a tiered approach to evidence, prioritizing the most rigorous study designs. When citing research, we link to the primary source — not a secondary summary — and include publication date, journal, and relevant methodology notes.

Tier 1 — StrongestSystematic reviews and meta-analyses (Cochrane, PubMed)
Tier 2 — StrongRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) with adequate sample size
Tier 3 — ModerateProspective cohort studies, well-designed observational studies
Tier 4 — PreliminaryIn vitro studies, animal studies, single case reports — cited with explicit caveats

When evidence is limited, conflicting, or based only on preliminary data, we say so clearly. We do not overstate findings to make content more compelling.

Our Editorial Review Process

01

Topic Research

We begin with systematic review databases, government health agency guidelines, and academic literature to map the evidence landscape. For honey-specific topics, we also consult the National Honey Board, American Beekeeping Federation publications, and apiculture journals.

02

Drafting with Inline Citations

Content is drafted with citations linked to specific studies, including publication year, journal, and methodology notes. Statistical claims (e.g., effect sizes, percentages) are traced to primary sources — not secondary summaries.

03

Fact-Checking

All statistical claims, safety warnings, dosage references, and health assertions are verified against primary sources. Claims that lack adequate supporting evidence are rewritten with appropriate hedging or removed.

04

Medical & Safety Review

Articles covering health conditions, dosing, contraindications (e.g., infant botulism, diabetic considerations, drug interactions) are cross-referenced with WHO, FDA, NHS, and NIH guidance before publication.

05

Publication & Dating

Every published article displays a "Date Published" and "Last Updated" date, meeting Google's E-E-A-T guidelines for temporal transparency. Dates reflect the original publication and most recent substantive update, not minor formatting changes.

06

Ongoing Review Cycle

Content is audited every 3–6 months. Articles on rapidly evolving topics (e.g., Manuka research, infant feeding guidelines) are reviewed more frequently. New systematic reviews or significant RCTs trigger an immediate update review.

Health & Medical Content Policy

All content on Raw Honey Guide is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We apply the following standards to all health-related articles:

  • Therapeutic claims (e.g., "cures," "treats," or "prevents" disease) are only used when backed by systematic reviews or government-endorsed clinical evidence
  • Health statements use qualified language: "may support," "research suggests," "some evidence indicates," "consult your doctor before…"
  • Articles covering medical conditions, contraindications, or dosing include an explicit disclaimer directing readers to consult a licensed healthcare provider
  • Infant botulism warning (honey under age 1) appears on every relevant recipe and guide
  • Diabetic blood sugar impact is disclosed wherever glycemic content is discussed

Content Update Policy

Every article on Raw Honey Guide displays both a "Date Published" and a "Last Updated" date. These dates reflect meaningful content changes — not minor formatting edits. We follow this update schedule:

Within 30 days of publication

New systematic review or large RCT

Within 14 days

Government guideline changes (WHO, FDA, NHS)

Every 3–6 months

Routine content audit

Reviewed within 7 business days

Reader-submitted correction

Substantive corrections are noted inline in the updated article with a "Correction:" note and a revised "Last Updated" date.

Corrections & Feedback

We welcome corrections, additions, and feedback from beekeepers, researchers, and readers. If you believe a factual claim is incorrect, a citation is missing, or a safety warning should be added, please reach out. We review every request.

Verified corrections result in: (1) an updated article, (2) a "Correction:" note in the relevant section, and (3) a refreshed "Last Updated" date. We do not silently delete inaccurate content — we correct it transparently.

For corrections, suggestions, or data licensing questions, contact us at hello@rawhoneyguide.com.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who reviews the health claims on Raw Honey Guide?
All health-related content is reviewed against peer-reviewed literature from journals including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, BMJ, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (JAFC), Nutrients, and Food Chemistry. Articles involving medical conditions, dosing, or safety are cross-checked with guidance from WHO, FDA, and NIH. We do not employ in-house medical staff, and all guides include a disclaimer to consult a qualified healthcare provider for personal medical decisions.
Does Raw Honey Guide accept sponsored content or paid placements?
No. Raw Honey Guide is independently operated and does not accept payment from honey brands, beekeeping associations, supplement companies, or retailers for editorial coverage, product placement, or reviews. Recommendations are based on publicly available data, certified quality indicators (USDA Organic, True Source Certified, UMF ratings), and peer-reviewed research — not commercial relationships.
How do you decide which research to cite?
We prioritize systematic reviews and meta-analyses (highest evidence tier), followed by randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and government health agency guidelines. We cite the primary source — not secondary summaries — and include publication year, journal, and where relevant, sample size and methodology caveats. When evidence is preliminary, limited, or conflicting, we say so explicitly.
How quickly do you update content when new research is published?
Major new findings (especially from systematic reviews or large RCTs) are incorporated within 30 days of publication. All articles display a "Last Updated" date. Our team conducts periodic content audits — typically every 3–6 months — to refresh statistics, remove outdated claims, and incorporate new studies. We prioritize health-related articles for more frequent review.
What is your policy on health disclaimers?
All content is for educational purposes only. No article on Raw Honey Guide constitutes medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Articles covering medical conditions, supplements, or dosing include an explicit disclaimer directing readers to consult a licensed healthcare provider. We do not make therapeutic claims (e.g., "cures," "treats," or "prevents" disease) without robust clinical evidence, and we hedge all health statements with qualifiers like "may support," "research suggests," or "preliminary evidence indicates."
How do you handle corrections or factual errors?
We take accuracy seriously. If you believe a factual claim is incorrect or a citation is missing, you can reach us via the contact form. We review every correction request, and if the claim is found to be inaccurate, we update the article, add a correction note, and update the "Last Modified" date. Substantive corrections are noted directly in the article.