Honey Antioxidant Value Index
Which variety gives you the most antioxidant capacity per dollar spent? Ranking 16 common honeys by ORAC per dollar at typical retail prices.
Key Finding
Buckwheat honey (187 ORAC/$) delivers about 7× more antioxidant capacity per dollar than manuka honey (25 ORAC/$) at typical retail prices. Clover — widely considered a "basic" honey — delivers the same ORAC per dollar as manuka. Manuka's premium buys methylglyoxal (MGO) antibacterial activity, which ORAC does not capture.
How We Calculated It
The Antioxidant Value Index is a single derived metric:
ORAC per dollar = ORAC (μmol TE / 100 g) ÷ price per 100 g Price per 100 g = retail price (12 oz jar) ÷ 340 g × 100
ORAC source
Gheldof & Engeseth (2002) J. Agric. Food Chem.; Bertoncelj et al. (2007) Food Chemistry. Mid-range values; individual jars vary ±30% by geography and harvest.
Price source
Mid-point of published retail range for 12-oz jars from the Raw Honey Guide catalog (April 2026). Specialty or direct-from-producer prices may differ.
ORAC limitation: The USDA removed ORAC from its nutrient database in 2012 because high-ORAC diets did not produce proportional health benefits in controlled trials (Lotito & Frei 2004). Use ORAC for relative comparisons within honey — not as a clinical health claim. It does not measure MGO antibacterial activity, enzyme content, or flavour value.
Rankings: ORAC Per Dollar
Sorted by antioxidant capacity per dollar spent (based on ORAC per 100 g ÷ retail price per 100 g). Tier colours: Best Value ≥ 100 · High Value ≥ 50 · Fair Value ≥ 20 · Niche Value < 20
ORAC = Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (μmol Trolox equivalents per 100 g). Gheldof & Engeseth (2002); Bertoncelj et al. (2007). Prices: 12-oz retail, April 2026.
Price vs Potency
Each dot is one variety. X axis = price per tablespoon; Y axis = ORAC per tablespoon. The upper-left is where you want to be (high antioxidants, low price). The upper-right quadrant is structurally empty — no common honey is both expensive and exceptionally high in ORAC.
The Manuka Exception
The ORAC metric measures one dimension of honey chemistry — phenolic antioxidant capacity. Manuka honey's premium is built on a completely separate chemical pathway: methylglyoxal (MGO), which forms from dihydroxyacetone (DHA) inLeptospermum scoparium nectar.
MGO has clinically validated antibacterial activity against drug-resistant pathogens including MRSA (Cooper et al. 2010, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology) and H. pylori. For wound care, post-surgical dressings, and gastric applications, manuka with a verified UMF or MGO rating is genuinely differentiated. That use case is outside the scope of an ORAC-based comparison.
Summary: If your goal is antioxidant value per dollar, buckwheat wins by a wide margin. If your goal is antibacterial activity for wound care or gut health, manuka's premium is independently justified and this ranking is not the right frame.
Value Buying Guide
Best antioxidant value overall
187 ORAC per dollar. Molasses-bold flavour — best in smoothies, dark marinades, and overnight oats. Not subtle.
High value, more versatile flavour
Chestnut (96/dollar) — bitter, mineral-rich, works in savoury cooking and cheese pairings. Wildflower (62/dollar) — approachable, seasonal variation, everyday use.
Antibacterial / wound care
ORAC ranking is irrelevant here. Choose by verified MGO level. Manuka's premium is justified for this specific use case.
Low glycaemic sweetener (antioxidants secondary)
Lowest GI of any common honey (GI ≈ 32). Very low ORAC (9/dollar), but acacia's value proposition is glycaemic control, not antioxidants.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which honey gives you the most antioxidants per dollar?▾
Does this mean manuka honey is overpriced?▾
What is ORAC and why was it deprecated by the USDA?▾
Why is wildflower honey ranked above orange blossom for value?▾
How does the price data account for different jar sizes?▾
Raw Honey Guide Editorial Team
Reviewed by certified beekeepers and apiculture specialists. Our editorial team consults with professional beekeepers, food scientists, and registered dietitians to ensure accuracy. Health claims are cited against peer-reviewed literature from Cochrane, JAFC, BMJ, and Nutrients.